Tax & Accounting News
Tax Cut & Jobs Act: Individual & Small Business Provisions
Caution: This is a synopsis of some of the provisions included in the House bill (HR 1) that was passed by a vote of 227 to 205 on November 16, 2018, and the Senate's version of the bill as it was sent from the Finance Committee to the full Senate, which will probably vote on it after returning from its Thanksgiving recess. The information on the Senate's bill is based on the "Chairman's Mark" as modified. There are significant differences between the two bills, so if the Senate passes its version, the two chambers will have to reconcile their differences before the legislation can be forwarded to the President for his signature.
Standard Deductions - The legislation would substantially increase the standard deductions and limit the itemized deductions. The additional standard deduction for the elderly and blind would be repealed. The following are the proposed new standard deductions as compared to the current amounts:
The standard deduction of a dependent would not exceed the greater of $500 or $250 plus the dependent's earned income.
Senate's Proposal - The basic standard deduction would be increased to $24,000 for married individuals filing a joint return, $18,000 for head-of-household filers, and $12,000 for all other taxpayers, with the amount of the standard deduction indexed for inflation for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018. Unlike the House version, the elderly and blind additions to the standard deduction would be retained.
Itemized Deductions - Currently itemized deductions include medical, taxes, home mortgage Interest, charitable contributions, and miscellaneous deductions. The Act, as proposed by the House, would substantially change what would be allowed as an itemized deduction.
Medical - Medical deductions would no longer be allowed.
Senate's Proposal - The current-law medical expense deduction would be retained.
Taxes - Would be allowed for property taxes only, but limited to a maximum of $10,000, and not at all for foreign real property taxes. Currently, this category includes a deduction for state and local income or sales taxes, which would no longer be allowed if this legislation is passed. This change is a huge point of contention for individuals residing in states with a high state and local income tax. Strategy: It may be appropriate to advise your clients who normally itemize or who are on the cusp of itemizing to estimate their state and local income taxes for 2017 and make sure they pay that amount by way of withholding or estimated taxes before year end, just in case state income tax is no longer deductible after 2017.
Senate's Proposal - No state and local taxes of any type would be allowed as an itemized deduction. However, deductions for state, local and foreign property taxes, and sales taxes, that are presently deductible in computing income on an individual's Schedule C, E, or F would continue to be deductible on those forms.
Home Mortgage Interest - Currently taxpayers can deduct the interest on up $1 million of home acquisition debt and $100,000 of home equity debt on their primary residence and a second home. The legislation would reduce the $1 million limit of home acquisition debt to $500,000 for homes purchased after 11/2/2017. The $1M cap continues to apply to mortgages already in existence on Nov. 2, 2017, as well as for taxpayers who have entered into a binding written contract before that date to close on the purchase of a principal residence before January 1, 2018, and who purchase such residence before April 1, 2018.
The Act would no longer allow home equity debt interest or second home interest as a deduction. We must assume if the equity debt were no longer deductible as home mortgage interest, it would become excess debt and traceable to its use. This can be a major issue for some of your clients that have been using their home's equity for no deductible purposes. It can also solve a problem where home equity debt was used for a business purpose, allowing the interest to be traced to the business use.
Interest paid on a pre-11/2/2017 primary residence acquisition debt that is refinanced would be allowed only to the extent the refinanced debt doesn't exceed the principal amount of the refinanced debt immediately before the refinancing. The deduction would be available only for the term of the original loan or if the principal of such original indebtedness is not amortized over its term, the expiration of the term of the first refinancing of such indebtedness (or if earlier, the date which is 30 years after the date of such 1st refinancing).
Senate's Proposal - The $1 million acquisition debt limitation would be retained for primary and second residences, but no deduction would be allowed for interest on equity debt beginning with 2018.
Charitable Contribution - Charitable contributions will continue to be deductible, and the current 50% of AGI deduction limitation would be increased to 60%, allowing larger contributions. The long-standing charity mileage rate of 14 cents would be replaced with "a rate which takes into account the variable cost of operating an automobile."
Senate's Proposal - Conforms to the House's proposal with regard to the percentage increase.
Miscellaneous Itemized Deductions -In this catch-all category for deductions, the Act would make the following changes:
-
Employee business expenses - Would no longer be allowed.
-
Tax preparation fees - Would no longer be deductible.
-
Casualty Losses - Personal casualty losses would no longer be allowed except for those in federally declared disaster areas that special legislation allows without itemizing. Personal casualty gains in excess of personal casualty losses would be treated as capital gains and all such losses as capital losses.
-
Gambling losses would still be allowed, as would gambling expenses (added by the legislation), to the extent of gambling income.
Senate's Proposal - The Senate's bill would repeal all itemized deductions currently subject to the 2% of AGI reduction. Casualty losses incurred in a Presidentially declared disaster area would be able to be claimed as a personal casualty loss (subject to the current law $100 and 10% of AGI limitations). Regarding gambling expenses, the Senate's proposal is essentially the same as the House's and is intended to clarify that the limitation on losses from wagering transactions applies both to the actual costs of an individual's wagers and to other expenses incurred by the individual in connection with the conduct of that individual's gambling activity, such as an individual's otherwise deductible expenses in traveling to or from a casino. (Travel expenses might be applicable to a professional gambler.)
Exemptions - Under today's law taxpayers are allowed a personal exemption of $4,050 for the filer and spouse (if married) and each dependent. Under the legislation the deduction for personal and dependent exemptions would be repealed.
Senate's Proposal - The deduction for personal and dependent exemptions would be repealed.
Tax Rates - Under current law there are seven tax brackets; 10, 15, 25, 28, 33, 35 and 39.6%. The proposed tax rates would be 12, 25, 35 and 39.6%. Each of the brackets are a step function, meaning that the income within each is taxed at the same rate until the income exceeds that bracket at which time the additional income is taxed at the next brackets rate. The thresholds would be inflation adjusted after 2018. The table below illustrates the proposed tax brackets.
12% Bracket Higher Income Phase-Out - The Act would phase out the benefit of the 12% tax bracket by $6 for every $100 the taxpayer's AGI exceeds $1 Mil for single taxpayers and $1.2 Mil for MFJ.
Senate's Proposal - There would still be seven brackets, but the rates would be lowered as shown in the table below. There would not be a phaseout of the lower brackets for high-income filers as is proposed by the House. Amounts would be inflation adjusted for years after 2018.
Kiddie Tax - The Act would modify the way the "kiddie tax" is calculated and removes from the computation any reference to the child's parent's return.
Senate's Proposal - Kiddie Tax - The Senate's bill would change how the tax of a child with unearned income is calculated, with the child's tax no longer based on the parent's tax situation or the unearned income of siblings. Instead, the child's taxable income attributable to earned income would be taxed using the single brackets and rates, while taxable income attributable to net unearned income would be taxed using the rates and brackets for trusts and estates.
Enhanced Child Tax Credit and New Family Tax Credit - The Act would increase the amount of the child tax credit (CTC) from the current $1,000 to $1,600 and the first $1,000 (subject to inflation adjustment) would be refundable. In addition, the Act would add a $300 nonrefundable credit for non-child dependents.
A taxpayer would have to provide a Social Security number for the qualifying child in order to claim the enhanced child tax credit.
The Act also includes a "family credit" that would provide a $300 nonrefundable credit for each taxpayer, and each spouse where a couple is filing jointly. The taxpayer identification number of each individual for whom the $300 credit is claimed would need to be included on the return, and it must have been issued before the return's due date. The non-child and the family credit would expire after 2022.
These credits would phase-out for taxpayers with income beginning at $115,000 for single filers and $230,000 for joint filers.
Senate's Proposal - The child tax credit would be increased to $2,000 per qualifying child, and the age limit for a qualifying child would be changed so that it would apply to a qualifying child under the age of 18 (currently under age 17). The maximum refundable portion of the credit would be $1,000, subject to inflation adjustment. A $500 nonrefundable credit would be allowed for qualifying non-child dependents. The phaseout threshold would be $500,000 for for all filing statuses (this is down from $1 Mil for MFJ as originally proposed). The phaseout threshold amounts would not be indexed for inflation. There is no provision in the Senate's version for the family credit proposed by the House.
Capital Gains Tax - The Act retains the special rates for long-term capital gains, but increases the tax bracket range for the 15% bracket. The following table illustrates the taxable incomes at which the capital gains tax rates would apply. These amounts would be inflation-adjusted after 2018.
Senate's Proposal - Same breakpoints as in the House's version.
Education Benefits
-
Coverdell Education Savings Accounts - No further contributions would be allowed after 2017 and the funds can be rolled into a Sec 529 plan.
-
Sec 529 College Savings Plan - Would continue and a provision would be added allowing up to $10,000 a year to be used for grammar school and high school education expenses. Rollovers from Sec 529 plans to ABLE programs would be allowed. A 529 plan could be established for an unborn child (defined as a child in utero).
-
Higher Education Interest - The Act would repeal the deduction of up to $2,500 for higher education interest.
-
Employer Provided Education Assistance - The Act would repeal the $5,250 tax-free fringe benefit available to employees under existing law.
-
American Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC) - The Act would retain the current AOTC and enhance it by increasing the number of years that it applies from 4 to 5 with the credit in the 5th year limited to $1,250 and no more than $500 would be refundable. The phaseout thresholds would be inflation-adjusted after 2018.
-
Lifetime Learning and Hope Credits - The Act would repeal both of these credits.
Senate's Proposal - The Senate's bill does not include any reforms for education credits or education savings plans except as follows:.
Sec 529 Plans - Contributions to a 529 plan for an unborn child would be permitted after 2017.
Distributions after 2017 from 529 plans would be allowed to be rolled over to an ABLE account without penalty, provided that the ABLE account is owned by the designated beneficiary of that 529 account, or a member of the designated beneficiary's family.
Enhanced ABLE Accounts - Effective upon enactment and through 2025, the contribution limitation (currently the per-donee annual gift exclusion amount) would be increased with respect to contributions made by the designated beneficiary of the ABLE account, who would be allowed to contribute an additional amount, up to the lesser of (a) the Federal poverty line for a one-person household or (b) the individual's compensation for the taxable year. In addition the designated beneficiary of the ABLE account would be allowed to claim a Saver's Credit for contributions made to the account.
Plug-In Electric Drive Motor Vehicle Credit - Repealed after 2017.
Senate's Proposal - This credit is not mentioned in the Senate's bill.
Residential Energy Efficient Property - Geothermal, wind energy and fuel cell property credit was only allowed prior to 2017. They would be included, effective for 2017, along with solar as property qualified for the 30% credit in years through 2019, 26% in 2020 and 22% in 2021.
Senate's Proposal - This credit is not mentioned in the Senate's bill.
Alimony - Currently alimony is deductible by the payer and income to the recipient. The Act would retain that treatment for divorce agreements completed through 2017. For divorce agreements entered into after 2017, alimony would no longer be deductible by the payer and would not be income the recipient.
Senate's Proposal - This subject is not mentioned in the Senate's bill.
Home Sale Exclusion - For sales after 2017 the Act would change the ownership and use period to 5 out of the prior 8 years and only allow an exclusion every 5 years. In addition, the Act would limit the exclusion for higher income taxpayers by phasing out the exclusion one dollar for every dollar by which a taxpayer's average modified adjusted gross income for the sale year and the two preceding years exceeds $500,000 ($250,000 for single filers).
Senate's Proposal - Like the House's proposal, the Senate's bill would require ownership and use for 5 out of 8 years prior to the sale, and would limit use of the exclusion to no more than once every 5 years, but it does not include a phaseout of the exclusion based on the taxpayer's AGI. The bill specifies that a prorated exclusion would be allowed if the taxpayer fails to meet the use and ownership requirements because of a change of place of employment, health, or, to the extent provided under regulations, unforeseen circumstances.
Moving Expenses - Under the Act, after 2017, moving expenses would no longer be deductible and employer reimbursement would be taxable. However, the current treatment for moving expenses would be allowed to continue for members of the Armed Forces on active duty who move pursuant to a military order.
Senate's Proposal -Agrees with the House's proposal.
Adoption Expenses - The original version of the Act would have repealed both the credit for adoption expenses and the tax-exempt adoption expense reimbursements from employers. The bill was amended to retain the nonrefundable adoption credit.
Senate's Proposal - This subject is not mentioned in the Senate's bill.
Roth IRA Recharacterizations - The Act would repeal the recharacterization provision, so when a conversion is made it would no longer be able to be undone.
Senate's Proposal - The modified Senate bill would also repeal the IRA recharacterization rule.
Archer MSA - The Act denies any further contribution after 2017 and would allow rollover into an HSA.
Senate's Proposal - This subject is not mentioned in the Senate's bill.
Private Activity Bonds - For those issued after 2017 the interest would no longer be tax exempt.
Senate's Proposal - This subject is not mentioned in the Senate's bill.
Employee Fringe Benefits - The Act would repeal the following:
-
Income exclusion for achievement awards
-
Dependent care assistance - Amendment would extend this exclusion through 2022.
-
Transportation Fringes - Transit passes, parking, etc.
Senate's Proposal - The exclusion from gross income and wages for qualified bicycle commuting reimbursements would be repealed. The bill does not address achievement awards or dependent care assistance.
Employer-Provided Housing - The exclusion for lodging provided on the employer's premises and for the convenience of the employer would be capped at $50,000 ($25,000 for married filing separate) and would apply to only one residence of the taxpayer at any given time. The exclusion would be phased out for higher income employees and would not be allowed at all for 5% owners.
Senate's Proposal - This subject is not mentioned in the Senate's bill.
Above-the-line Deductions - The following deductions from gross income would be repealed:
-
Certain expenses of performing artists.
-
Certain expenses of government officials.
-
The $250 deduction for eligible teachers' classroom supplies and professional development expenses.
Senate's Proposal - The modified proposal would increase the limit for the deduction of certain expenses of eligible educators to $500.
Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) - The Act would repeal the AMT after 2017.
Senate's Proposal - Would repeal AMT for individuals and corporations with the provision for individuals expiring after 2025.
Estate Taxes - The Act would increase the estate tax exclusion to $10 million, adjusted for inflation (the inflation adjusted amount is not known at this time). In addition, after 2024 the Act would repeal the estate and generation-skipping taxes while maintaining a beneficiary's stepped-up basis in estate property.
Senate's Proposal - The estate and gift taxes would be retained, but the estate and gift tax exclusion would be increased from $5 million to $10 million, with the $10 million amount indexed for inflation occurring after 2011.
Estate Taxes - The Act would increase the estate tax exclusion to $10 million, adjusted for inflation (the inflation adjusted amount is not known at this time). In addition, after 2024 the Act would repeal the estate and generation-skipping taxes while maintaining a beneficiary's stepped-up basis in estate property.
Senate's Proposal - The estate and gift taxes would be retained, but the estate and gift tax exclusion would be increased from $5 million to $10 million, with the $10 million amount indexed for inflation occurring after 2011.
Net Operating Loss - The Act would generally eliminate the 2-year carryback and NOLs would only be able to offset 90% of a year's income. The 20-year carryover period would be changed to an indefinite carryover period. Additionally, for NOLs incurred after 2017 and carried forward, an interest factor would be applied each year that would increase the amount of the NOL to preserve its value.
Senate's Proposal - The NOL deduction would be limited to 90% of taxable income (determined without regard to the deduction) and 80% for years after 2023. The proposal would repeal the two-year carryback and the special carryback provisions, but would allow a two-year carryback for certain losses incurred in the trade or business of farming.
Employer Credit For SS Taxes On Employee Tips - The Act alters the provision to include the current minimum wage amount (instead of $5.15) and increases the tip allocation from 8% to 10%.
Senate's Proposal - This topic is not addressed in the Senate's bill.
Business Expensing - The Act would permit 100% unlimited expensing of tangible business assets (except structures) acquired after September 27, 2017 and through 2022. Applies when a taxpayer first uses the asset (does not need to be new). The current $8,000 bonus depreciation add-on to the first year depreciation limit of luxury autos would be increased to $16,000.
Senate's Proposal - Generally the same as the House's proposal regarding 100% expensing. The modified version of the bill expands the definition of qualified property eligible for the additional first-year depreciation allowance to include qualified film, television and live theatrical productions, effective for productions placed in service after September 27, 2017, and before January 1, 2023. See also next paragraph.
Senate's Proposal - Luxury Autos and Listed Property - The maximum amount of allowable depreciation that applies to passenger autos put into service after 2017, and for which the bonus depreciation is not claimed, would be increased to $10,000 for the year in which the vehicle is placed in service, $16,000 for the second year, $9,600 for the third year, and $5,760 for the fourth and later years in the recovery period. The limitations would be inflation-indexed for passenger autos placed in service after 2018. The bonus depreciation first-year increase of $8,000 for the luxury auto limitation would continue to apply.
Computer or peripheral equipment would be removed from the definition of listed property, and therefore would not be subject to the stricter substantiation requirements that apply to listed property.
Senate's Proposal - Recovery Periods - The recovery period for depreciation of nonresidential real and residential rental property would be shortened to 25 years from the current-law 39 and 27.5 years, respectively. The ADS recovery period for residential rental property would be reduced from the current 40 years to 30 years for property placed in service after 2017. Further, the separate definitions of qualified leasehold improvement, qualified restaurant, and qualified retail improvement property would be eliminated, and a general 10-year recovery period for qualified improvement property would be put into place.
Sec 179 - The Act would increase the maximum expensing amount to $5 Mil, and the phase-out to $20 Mil, effective for property purchased and placed in service after 11/2/17. Both amounts would be subject to inflation adjustment after 2018. Qualified energy efficient heating and air conditioning property would be eligible for Sec 179 expensing if acquired and placed in service after November 2, 2017.
Senate's Proposal - The maximum Sec 179 expensing amount would be increased to $1 Mil and the phase-out would begin at $2.5 Mil of purchased qualified property. These amounts, as well as the $25,000 limit on certain SUVs, would be indexed for inflation after 2018. The definition of Sec 179 property would be expanded to include (1) certain depreciable tangible personal property used predominantly to furnish lodging or in connection with furnishing lodging, and (2) any of the following improvements to nonresidential real property placed in service after the date such property was first placed in service: roofs; heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning property; fire protection and alarm systems; and security systems.
Business Interest Expense Limitation - Under the Act, the interest deduction for businesses would be limited. However the Act carves out an exception for small businesses with gross receipts of $25 Mil or less.
Senate's Proposal - Includes a limitation on business interest, but exempts small businesses with average gross receipts of $15 Mil or less for the prior three taxable years. Would allow a taxpayer to elect to treat any real property development, redevelopment, construction, reconstruction, acquisition, conversion, rental, operation, management, leasing, or brokerage trade or business as not a trade or business for purposes of the limitation, and therefore the limitation would not apply to such trades or businesses. A real property trade or business that elects out of the interest deduction limitation would be required to use ADS to depreciate its nonresidential real property, residential rental property, and qualified improvement property. The modified proposal would allow a farming business (as defined in section 263A(e)(4)) to elect not to be subject to the limitation. A farming business making the election would be required to use the alternative depreciation system (ADS) to depreciate any property used in the farming business with a recovery period of ten years or more.
Business Entertainment - Under the Act, no deduction would be allowed for entertainment, amusement or recreation activities, facilities, or membership dues relating to such activities or other social purposes. However, the 50% limitation will continue to apply to expenses for food or beverages and to qualifying business meals.
Senate's Proposal - Generally the same as the House's but would also apply the 50% limitation to the employer's expenses associated with providing food and beverages to employees through an eating facility that meets requirements for de minimis fringes. The modified bill would disallow an employer's deduction for expenses associated with meals provided for the convenience of the employer on the employer's business premises, or provided on or near the employer's business premises through an employer-operated facility that meets certain requirements.
Sec 1031Exchanges - Would only apply to real property.
Senate's Proposal - Would limit the application of Sec 1031 to real property that is not held primarily for sale.
Self-Created Property - Under current law, a self-created patent, invention, model or design (whether or not patented), or secret formula or process, is treated as a capital asset and subject to capital gain rates when sold. Under the Act, these items would be subject to ordinary tax rates upon sale. The original proposal would have repealed the election to treat musical compositions and copyrights in musical works as a capital asset; this provision was removed in an amendment to the bill.
Senate's Proposal - This topic is not addressed in the Senate's bill.
Domestic Production Deduction - Would be repealed.
Senate's Proposal - Would also repeal this deduction.
Business Credits - The Act would make the following changes to business tax credits:
-
Employer-provided Child Care Credit - Repealed
-
Rehabilitation Credit - Repealed
-
Work Opportunity Credit - Repealed
-
Deduction for unused business credits - Repealed
-
New Markets Credit - Repealed
-
Disabled Access Credit - Repealed
Senate's Proposal - Only the following existing credits are mentioned in the Senate's proposal:
-
The "orphan drug" credit would be modified;
-
The rehabilitation credit (would repeal the 10% credit for pre-1936 buildings and would provide a 10% credit for qualified rehabilitation expenditures with respect to a certified historic structure), and
-
Deduction for certain unused business credits would be repealed.
Maximum Rate On Business Income of Individuals - A portion of net income distributed by a pass-through entity to an owner or shareholder may be treated as "business income" subject to a maximum rate of 25%, instead of ordinary individual income tax rates. The remaining portion of net business income would be treated as compensation and continue to be subject to ordinary individual income tax rates.
Owners or shareholders receiving net income derived from an active business activity (including any wages received) would determine their business income by reference to their "capital percentage" of the net income from such activities.
-
Owners or shareholders generally would be able to elect to apply a capital percentage of 30 percent to the net business income derived from active business activities to determine their business income eligible for the 25% rate. That determination would leave the remaining 70% of net business income subject to ordinary individual income tax rates.
-
Alternatively, owners or shareholders would be allowed to elect to apply a formula based on the facts and circumstances of their business to determine a capital percentage of greater than 30%. That formula would measure the capital percentage based on a rate of return (the Federal short term rate plus 7%) multiplied by the capital investments of the business. Once made, the election of the alternative formula would be binding for a five-year period.
In most cases, taxpayers actively participating in businesses involving the performance of services in the fields of law, accounting, consulting, engineering, financial services, or performing arts (i.e., personal service businesses) would not be eligible for the 30% capital percentage but would be allowed to use the facts and circumstances formula.
Amendment to House Proposal - The proposal was amended to provide a 9% tax rate instead of the ordinary 12% rate, for the first $75,000 in net business taxable income of an active owner or shareholder earning less than $150,000 in taxable income through a pass-through business. If taxable income were to exceed $150,000, a phaseout would apply, with full phaseout at $225,000. The 9% rate would be available to all types of businesses and would be phased in over 5 taxable years (for 2018 and 2019, the rate would be 11%; for 2020 and 2021, 10%; for 2022 and later, 9%). The $75,000 and $150,000 amounts would be $37,500 and $75,000 for unmarried taxpayers and $56,250 and $112,500 for heads of household.
Senate's Proposal -Taxpayers with pass-through income would get a tax break, but in a way that is less complicated than in the House's proposal. Accordingly, an individual taxpayer generally would be able to deduct 17.4% of domestic qualified business income from a partnership, S corporation, or sole proprietorship, but if taxable income exceeds $250,000 ($500,000 MFJ), the deduction would be limited to 50% of the taxpayer's allocated or pro rata share of W-2 wages of the partnership or S corporation, or 50% of the wages of the sole proprietorship. Where taxable income exceeds $250,000 ($500,000 MFJ), the deduction would be phased out. The benefit of the deduction for service providers would phase out over a $50,000 range for married individuals filing jointly ($25,000 for other individuals), with the phaseout applying when taxable income exceeds $150,000 for married individuals filing jointly ($75,000 for other individuals). when taxable income exceeds $250,000 ($500,000 MFJ). For purposes of this deduction a service trade or business would be any trade or business activity involving the performance of services in the fields of health, law, engineering, architecture, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, brokerage services, or any trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of one or more of its employees. Additional details of this proposal are not included here.
Corporate Tax Rate - Would be a flat 20%.
Senate's Proposal - Would be a flat 20%, but wouldn't become effective until 2019.
Personal Service Corporation Tax Rate - Would be a flat 25%
Senate's Proposal - The special tax rate for personal service corporations would be repealed. Therefore, the 20% rate also would apply to personal service corporations.
Items included in the Senate's Proposal that are not in the House's Proposal:
Expiration of Individual Provisions - All of the changes related to individuals would expire after 2025 per a modification added after the original proposal was made.
Worker Classification Safe Harbor - This proposal has been deleted from the bill.
Retirement Plan Contributions - The following changes would be made regarding retirement plan contributions:
-
A single aggregate limit would apply to contributions for an employee in a governmental Sec 457(b) plan and elective deferrals for the same employee under a Sec 401(k) plan or a 403(b) plan of the same employer.
-
Special rules that currently allow additional elective deferrals and catch-up contributions under Section 403(b) plans and governmental Sec 457(b) plans would be repealed.
-
The special rule allowing employer contributions to Sec 403(b) plans for up to five years after termination of employment would be repealed.
-
The proposal would revise application of the limit on aggregate contributions to a qualified defined contribution plan or a Sec 403(b) plan by having a single aggregate limit apply to contributions for an employee to any defined contribution plans, any Sec 403(b) plans, and any governmental Sec 457(b) plans maintained by the same employer.
Early Distribution Penalty - The proposal to apply the 10% early distribution penalty to a distribution from a governmental Sec 457(b) plan has been deleted.
Catch-up Contributions - An employee who is age 50 or over is allowed under current law to make a $6,000 (2017) catch-up contribution to employer-sponsored retirement plans, such as defined contribution plans, 403(b)s, etc. In the proposal an employee would not have been allowed to make a catch-up contribution if the employee's prior year wages were $500,000 or more; this proposal has been removed from the bill.
Paid Preparers Head of Household Due Diligence Requirement - The Senate's proposal directs the Secretary of the Treasury to promulgate due diligence requirements for paid preparers in determining eligibility for a taxpayer to file as head of household. Each failure to meet the due diligence requirements would result in a $500 penalty.
Excess Business Losses of Individuals - A taxpayer other than a C corporation would not be allowed an "excess business loss." Instead, the loss would be carried forward and treated as part of the taxpayer's net operating loss (NOL) carryforward in subsequent taxable years. Excess business loss for a taxable year is defined in the proposal as the excess of the taxpayer's aggregate deductions attributable to the taxpayer's trades or businesses for that year, over the sum of the taxpayer's aggregate gross income or gain for the year plus a "threshold amount" of $500,000 for married individuals filing jointly, or $250,000 for other individuals. The threshold amounts would be indexed for inflation. The limitation would be applied at the partner or shareholder level for partnerships and S corporations. This proposal is modeled after the current law limitation on certain farm losses.
Identifying Shares Sold - Under current law a taxpayer who disposes of part of his shares in a corporation that were acquired at different times or for different prices is allowed to choose which shares are considered sold if they are adequately identified. Otherwise, the oldest shares are considered to be the ones disposed (first-in, first-out, "FIFO"). The Senate's proposal would take away the option of specifically identifying the shares to be sold or donated and would require an investor selling or donating part of a holding with different bases or holding periods to use the FIFO method. This change would apply to individually held stocks as well as shares of mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). However, investors in funds and dividend-reinvestment plans who can use the "average cost" method of computing taxable gain would be allowed to continue to use it. The upshot of this change is that a method of minimizing taxes would be taken away from some investors. Strategy: Clients who intend to sell or donate to charity specific lots of shares they hold should be advised to do so before the end of 2017.
Individual ACA Shared Responsibility Payment - The Senate's modified proposal would repeal the penalty tax for individuals who don't have health insurance coverage, effective with respect to health coverage status for months beginning after December 31, 2018.
1040 for Seniors - The IRS would be required to publish a simplified income tax return form designated a Form 1040SR, for use by persons who are age 65 or older as of the close of the tax year.
Incorrect Levies on IRAs and Retirement Plans - The modified bill would allow amounts that had been withdrawn from an IRA or employer-sponsored plan pursuant to an IRS levy and subsequently returned by the IRS because the levy was incorrect to be re-contributed to the original or another IRA or retirement plan.
Wrongful Incarceration Payments - The modified bill would extend the statute of limitations to December 17, 2017 for filing a claim for a credit or refund of tax resulting from the provision in the PATH Act of 2015 that excludes payments received due to wrongful incarceration.
New Employer Credit for Paid Family and Medical Leave - Under this proposal, for 2018 and 2019, eligible employers would be allowed to claim a general business credit equal to 12.5% of the amount of wages paid to qualifying employees while the employees are on family and medical leave, if the rate of payment under the program is 50% of the employee's normal wages. The credit would be increased by 0.25 percentage points (but not above 25%) for each percentage point that the rate of payment exceeds 50 percent.
Lee Reams, BSME, EA
Editor-in-Chief
Besides his role at CountingWorks as an educator and speaker to thousands of accountants nationwide, Lee manages a technical research service for a large group of tax accountants which sharpens his technical skills. Lee served on the Board of Blackline Systems, is a former Board of Director for the California Tax Education Council, is a Past President of the San Fernando Valley Chapter of Enrolled Agents, Member and Past Director for the California Society of Enrolled Agents.
Recommended Professionals
In the face of economic uncertainty, TaxBuzz is the industry's most up-to-date tax information.
Join 60,000 who get our weekly newsletter. No spam.
Need help selecting a firm?
Use our specialized search engine and get matched to the best accounting and tax firm for your needs.